In case you missed it, last month Google announced a pretty slick open-sourced initiative called Accelerated Mobile Pages (AMP).
Unveiled in collaboration with over 30 other publishers (including Twitter, Pinterest, WordPress, Chartbeat, Parse.ly, Adobe Analytics and LinkedIn), this project is geared towards dramatically improving the performance of the mobile web (making content much faster than it does today).
Essentially, they want to utilize the new AMP publisher framework to help complex webpages with rich content such as video, animations, graphics, and ads to be able to load instantaneously.
Additionally, they hope to enable the same code to work across multiple platforms and devices so that content can appear everywhere in an instant—no matter what type of phone, tablet or mobile device people are using. The effort is very similar in focus to that of Facebook Instant Articles and Apple News.
Publishers such as Vox, The Verge, BuzzFeed and the Washington Post are already live as the earliest adopters of the new AMP pages.
AMP’s in the wild
Google has been kind enough to create a special version of search results that people can use to see AMP-enabled search (http://g.co/ampdemo). Note: It only works for searches on your mobile device.
If you go to that link on your smartphone you’ll see what looks like the typical Google home page. However, in this version you’ll see a prompt that tells you it’s an AMP-enabled result.
A search for “democratic debate” returns a carousel of articles at the top and article listings below. Clicking on the articles in the carousel — the US News article, for example — brings up the post (I kid you not) almost instantaneously from the bottom of the screen.
Additionally, users will notice that the article loads within Google as opposed to launching within the actual website itself – which occurs with non AMP links on the search results page.
As for the articles listed below the carousel as well as the traditional SERP results, the load time seems on par with regular search, these are not AMP-enabled. If there aren’t AMP pages in the results, you won’t see the carousel.
[su_highlight background=”#efefef”]The post on the left is AMP-enabled, on the right is regular.[/su_highlight]
Why it’s great
Improved site speed is great for users, leads to better user experience and higher engagement/conversion
According to a KissMetrics study, if an e-commerce site is making $100,000 per day, a 1 second page delay could potentially cost $2.5 million in lost sales every year. That’s huge!
In a separate study, the folks at Wal-Mart found that every 1 second of improvement led to up to a 2% increase in conversions, every 0.1 second of improvement led to incremental revenue increase of up to 1%, and reduced bounce rates correlated strongly to improvements in SEO visibility.
Improvements in site speed may lead to SEO ranking benefits
Though it is not clear if enabling AMP pages will be directly beneficial to SEO, the indirect benefits of improving site performance could allow sites with AMP enabled to receive a benefit in rank performance in mobile searches.
User experience and site speed have been a significant focus for Google over the years, and it has been a part of Google’s natural search algorithm since 2010.
[su_highlight background=”#efefef”]Update (12/9/15):[/su_highlight]
This is confirmed. According to Google, AMP pages are likely to receive a ranking boost and may even be labeled as “fast” in mobile search results.
Inclusion of AMP content in above-the-fold mobile carousel
This has the most potential to draw a significant number of clicks simply due to the prominence of the news carousel within search results.
The AMP-enabled results are purposely above-the-fold where they are easy for mobile users to click and consume.
The publishers share the belief that faster mobile pages will lead to more content consumed, more ads clicked, more subscribers, and generally great levels of engagement for adopters of AMP technology.
Per the above, Twitter has found that making articles faster in our apps has resulted in their users reading more content from Tweets.
In fact, Twitter has found that making articles faster in our apps has resulted in their users reading more content from Tweets.
WordPress is making it easy to adopt
Wordpress already has a plugin which should help you to enable AMP content on your blog. I’m planning to try it out myself soon.
Why it’s not practical
AMP-enablement criteria remains unclear – UPDATED
Maybe this is me just not knowing enough about the way it’s coded, but is it an “all or nothing” deal? Does every element of the page have to be AMP-compliant or can some things not be. For example, pages can be “mobile-friendly” according to Google, but may still return mobile usability errors.
[su_highlight background=”#efefef”]Update (12/9 – 12/11):[/su_hightlight]
Google is beginning to clear this up. They’re slowly but surely releasing information through various news outlets including early AMP adoption/progress, how to implement and validate AMP pages, and some webmasters have begun to detect updates to Google’s schema article markup and structured data testing tool.
[su_highlight background=”#efefef”]Update (1/15/16 & 1/20/16):[/su_highlight]
A new report was added to the Google Search Console under the Search Appearance tab for AMP errors and have also added some additional documentation around the technical creation of AMP pages.
Timeline for AMP pages to appear in SERP’s not explicit – UPDATED
While Google does provide a demo, timeline for AMP-enablement in traditional mobile search results remains unclear. Therefore, it is unclear when sites will receive the value-add of going with AMP’s, meaning that it might be a lot of work for little payoff (for a little while).
[su_highlight background=”#efefef”]Update (11/24/15):[/su_highlight]
Google has announced that it plans to support fast-loading AMP’s within Google search “early next year,” probably in February 2016.
[su_highlight background=”#efefef”]Update (2/18/16):[/su_highlight]
Google Is To Launch AMP In Search Results On February 24, 2016 according to SEL and Ad Age.
AMP content appears to be focused more on blog/article page-types as opposed to traditional webpages
Maybe AMP’s are geared more towards content-heavy blog articles or similar publications, and applying the logic to traditional sites was never the intent. That remains unclear. Even so, applying the AMP methodology to more traditional page types may prove difficult for a lot of reasons (see below).
Additionally, if trying to apply AMP HTML to an entire site (rather than page) this would require a complete overhaul of a site’s coding framework which could be incredibly labor-intensive.
Although AMP has said it can be used in responsive, the stripped down nature of the pages may not play well across desktop and mobile (the core “on size fits all” coding benefit of responsive).
Thus, using AMP may unforeseen difficulties when trying to project to an entirely responsive setting – and not just individual articles or pages, and it may result in the need to create/maintain alternate versions of every page, as well as alternate code-bases. Not ideal!
AMP is likely to lead to duplicate content issues with SEO
Based on what I’ve researched, the use of AMP pages on mobile-devices may necessitate the creation of two unique pages.
Although this can be managed through the use of features such as canonical tags, the creation of two pages could create both logistical issues and inadvertent duplicate content issues if managed improperly. As many sites/organizations have difficulty managing duplicate content, this could create a logistical hell.
In my experience, managing duplicate content is difficult for larger organizations.
Additionally, it is also unclear how Google would determine when/how to use/index the AMP vs. standard version of the page.
[su_highlight background=”#efefef”]Update (1/27/16):[/su_highlight]
This has been made a little more clear in testing WordPress AMP plugin. It looks as if there is a amphtml link rel tag on the primary article page to denote the AMP page, and the AMP page then canonicalizes back to the main article page.
Example for this page:
<link rel="amphtml" href="https://jacobstoops.com/blog/google-accelerated-mobile-pages/" />
“Light” versions of pages may negate any speed-related conversion advantages
For example, the WordPress.com AMP example featured both an AMP-enabled page and a standard page – which were drastically different from a user experience perspective.
Do the AMP-enabled pages convert better when they’re stripped down? On a blog post maybe, but how about on a traditional website? Maybe not.
There are significant limitations with respect to analytics tracking capabilities
[su_highlight background=”#efefef”]Update (11/9/15 & 12/9/15):[/su_highlight]
Tracking and analytics still appears to be a liability of AMP pages. However, there does appear to be indications that some analytics vendors are beginning to work to support AMP including comscore, as well as chartBeat, Google Analytics, and Parse.ly.
There is now some documentation beginning to be built out on GitHub relating to analytics usage and API’s for AMP’s, but it is still relatively unclear how their new tagging structure will work with existing analytics solutions. To date, the solution still appears to be unfinished.
Preliminary end-to-end testing for publishers and analytics vendors is expected to start in late December, with full testing happening in mid to late January. In addition to the analytics partners mentioned above, Nielsen, Adobe Analytics, and ClickTale have expressed their intention to support AMP in 2016.
[su_highlight background=”#efefef”]Update (2/1/16):[/su_highlight]
Google announced that Google Analytics now supports tracking Accelerated Mobile Pages (AMP) pages. Per Google, “The Google Analytics team is committed to helping our users measure their content wherever it appears. So, for publishers looking to use AMP to provide an improved user experience, we’ve released Google Analytics measurement capabilities for Accelerated Mobile Pages. AMP support in Google Analytics makes it easy to identify your best content and optimize your user experience.”
Limited support for 3rd-party ad serving
This will limit publishers abilities to monetize their content, which could lead to slower adoption of AMP until ad serving capabilities are enhanced.
[su_highlight background=”#efefef”]Update (11/24/15):[/su_highlight]
Google has announced that several advertising platforms including OutBrain, AOL, OpenX, DoubleClick and Adsense are working within the framework to improve the advertising experience for users, publishers and advertisers on the mobile web.
[su_highlight background=”#efefef”]Update (1/25/16):[/su_highlight]
The folks over at the AMP project have announced that there will be at least basic support for ads when Google integrates AMP pages into results in February 2016. According to the site, “When AMP launches on Google Search in February, it will include important, basic functionalities. These include the ability to traffic ads with ad servers of your choice, support for multiple demand sources and formats (including native ads), full control over ads placements, and viewability measurement. It also includes integration with 20+ ad tech vendors, all of whom are excited to participate in the AMP initiative…” This is good news for publishers.
AMP example pages did not score well on mobile according to Google’s Page Speed tool (WTF?!?)
Take this for what it’s worth, but the page I tested scored a 75.
This indicates one (or all) of the following:
- Traditional site performance improvement strategies should still be prioritized and are still necessary for holistic site speed improvements
- AMP is not yet a holistic solution to improving overall site speed
- Google’s Page Speed Insights Tool may not yet be calibrated to take AMP into account
Accelerated Mobile Pages seems like – and are – a great idea. However, there are a lot of logistical challenges that they’ll have to work on before these can become more mainstream than blog post page types.
What are your thoughts? Share them below.